8/16/2023 0 Comments Cincinnati gun websitesUnder Ohio’s preemption law, cities may not restrict the possession of any firearm, part of a firearm, their components or their ammunition. Technically, this is a restriction of the home rule powers of cities which, in Ohio, is enshrined in the state constitution. That’s why we describe the ordinances as ‘unconstitutional.’” The city said: “The purpose of the law is to ensure firearm laws are uniform throughout the state. “The Columbus ordinance banning ‘trigger activators’ is unconstitutional under Ohio law because Ohio has passed a firearm preemption statute.” “Ohioans for Concealed Carry and Buckeye Firearms Foundation have sued Columbus over a violation of state law,” said David Kessler, with Haynes, Kessler, Myers and Postalakis, representing the plaintiffs in both lawsuits. The gun lovers say Muething has not taken any action to oppose the new ordinance. On May 14 the Ohio gun advocates told Cincinnati City Solicitor Paula Boggs Muething that the ordinance is unconstitutional a violation of Ohio’s firearm preemption statute and that the city cannot enforce it. The city law would make it illegal to possess, use or sell trigger activators.īump stocks essentially convert a gun into a semi-automatic weapon. In Columbus, the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, Ohioans for Concealed Carry and Gary Witt challenged an emergency ordinance banning trigger activators within city limits. In the Cincinnati case, the Buckeye Firearms Foundation, Ohioans for Concealed Carry and Jordan Telting sued the city in Hamilton County Court. Two lawsuits in state courts filed on the first day of summer claim that city ordinances outlawing specific parts and components of guns are unconstitutional. CINCINNATI (CN) - Ohio gun advocates sued Cincinnati and Columbus this week, claiming city laws banning “trigger activators” - bump stocks - on guns are unconstitutional.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |